Is there a difference between the megapixel in digital point&shoot cameras and slr cameras? - point and shoot digital cameras with fastes shutter speed
I have a point and shoot from 7.1-megapixel camera, Sony Cybershot, and I get a Nikon D40. It has 6.1 megapixels. Should I? Is it worth it? Is there a difference between the quality of the megapixels and I'm going between the two spaces?
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Point And Shoot Digital Cameras With Fastes Shutter Speed Is There A Difference Between The Megapixel In Digital Point&shoot Cameras And Slr Cameras?
4 comments:
A 6MP DSLR is much better, a 14MP point and shoot camera.
There are many reasons. The main
1) physically larger pixels collect more light and produce less noise at high ISO.
2) large sensor allows a better impression (especially @ 8x10 or more), because the image has not requested an extension by far.
3) a goal of better quality (the kit lenses are best)
To grow 4) space as the ability or ambition to dictate.
No matter how many pixels the camera has P & S tend to break all 8x10. I saw great 6MP images 16x20 and still look good.
Yes, there is a difference.
A DSLR is not the megapixels, but the size of the sensors that capture light to create the image in a digital SLR is much larger than a rule and a compact digital camera. This means that the quality of the pixels can create a lot more to a cleaner image in many situations.
Second digital SLR has many more features that can change depending on situation. This can be very beneficial in some cases, such as shooting in the dark, or change the focus of a photo.
In general, however, if only for personal use, there is a significant price difference when buying a digital SLR camera will not be worth the price. The cost of the lenses is $ 200 or more. There is also the cost of the implementation of learning scenarios, a digital SLR camera. It is certainly a present one, compared to a point and shoot camera to be able to use! However, if you want, very nice pictures when a camera is a good way to go!
They are not a significant difference b / wn the two chambers when all I want to do is 4x6, 5x7 or 8x10 prints.
I assume that Sony is a compact car. The Nikon D40 offers the advantage of having a system of lenses and filters, and higher ISO shooting (flexible in different lighting conditions - even if I'm not sure it goes to ISO 100 - what is bad, check it out).
Sony aims to show (what) You can indeed use a viewfinder to compose pictures on the digital SLR camera. Much better if you use the skills of the pro-consumer.
Depends what you want ... When shooting a snapshot is only occasionally as a reminder of certain events Why should the extra money.
If you are serious about photography, then you should switch to a digital SLR with lens and filters - why not from the Nikon D80 instead of D40? Wider range of options, the price is not an exaggeration - more or less comparable to $ $ $, but up to 10 mp (if you have more photos to print). This wouldto keep more balance.
It may be a small difference, but
The fact is that you tell the difference?
Sometimes I ask myself the same question, but at the end of the day I watch the pictures I have both a Fuji 900E, women, and my Pentax point and shoot, and I can not blame them won.
I have an extension of the A1 center of Kiev took the evening and the clarity is as good as anything can be taken into hassleblad a few years ago, why change if the device has enough
Post a Comment